Lana Ruched Maternity Dress

I'm just past 20 weeks and can no longer wear most of my pre-pregnancy work wardrobe. I'm a pre-pregnancy 4/6, so I ordered the S and M in this dress. S is definitely too small given that I want to wear this to work and not have it be body-con - immediate "no." The M has some extra room at the sides of the torso, but I could live with this as I don't want it too tight on the bust. But the inner layer was still surprisingly tight on my hips and legs, just like the S was, and the back of the dress hugged my backside. I'm sure the L wouldn't work because there would be even more bagginess at the sides of the torso. I'm disappointed to realize this dress just isn't going to work for me, which is too bad because it is one of the few simple sheath dresses of it's type that I've found -- and I loved that it looks work-appropriate and is lined.

I ordered a medium which is my pre pregnancy size and has been my maternity size in all other brands but this one was way too small all over. I like the look and quality but I’m returning this and not ordering another size.

This backside of this dress was too form fitting for my liking. I wanted to wear it to business functions but I don't think it would be appropriate for that--maybe better for a date/night out with the girls.

This is a very darling dress but as other reviewers mentioned, there is little room for a growing belly. I ordered an XS size. It fit well on the chest, but felt really tight in the belly section. I then ordered a size S and it looked extremely large in the chest, but more comfortable in the mid section. I ended up returning both sizes. As reference, I'm 5'0" tall and 108 lbs on my third trimester.

Very very cute dress. Fits well and hides well unwanted rolls. Photographs don't do it enough justice. Looks like regular cotton dress in photos.

This dress is super cute, but it is definitely small. I ordered two dresses from Kim & Kai and they were both size small. My other dress fit perfectly, not even slightly snug. This dress, however, was much tighter.